
The Science Stuff: What is the 'Environmental Crisis'?
By Jesse Armstrong
Humanity makes up just 0.01% of all living things on earth, yet our footprint on this planet is enormous. Population growth and the dramatic development in the complexity of our infrastructure and technology have led to an exponential increase in our consumption of resources over the last 150 years. Scientists have estimated that we have used upwards of 135 billion tonnes of crude oil since 1870, humans are estimated to have altered more than 50% of the land area of the planet, and it was recently calculated that human-made materials now outweigh the mass of all living organisms. Our remarkable success as a species has taken a heavy toll on our environment, and the wildlife that inhabits it.
When we talk about our impact on the planet in terms of a looming environmental crisis, we refer to many different things. Activities like transport, construction, and agriculture require using massive quantities of materials such as crude oil, concrete, and steel, all resulting in vast CO2 emissions. The extraordinary quantities of livestock we rear to feed ourselves have a huge environmental impact, accounting for 14.5% of global emissions. Combine this with the loss of 46% of the trees on earth since the dawn of human civilisation and the result is a sharp increase in CO2 concentration in our atmosphere. The increase in global temperatures caused by these greenhouse gasses could have cataclysmic consequences if left unchecked. Already sea levels are rising as the oceans warm and glacial ice melts. CO2 absorption is acidifying the ocean, killing corals and other marine species, and extreme weather events such as tropical storms, droughts and flooding are increasing in frequency and severity. Deforestation for materials, mining, urbanisation, and agriculture is destroying precious habitats for wildlife, and as a result, humans have caused the loss of 82% of wild mammals and half of all plants. In other words, as a result of human destruction, we are currently living through the planets 6th mass extinction; the first extinction period since the Late Cretaceous Epoch in which the dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid. As if all this wasn’t enough, human-made pollutants have reached the farthest reaches of our planet’s land, air and sea, permeating the remaining wild spaces. Plastics are being found everywhere from the bottom of the Mariana trench to the summit of Mount Everest, and the great Pacific garbage patch is now the size of Texas. Other contaminating materials are more sinister still. Heavy metals, radioactive isotopes, persistent organic pollutants, and many other dangerous chemicals are also widespread with devastating impacts, particularly for aquatic life. In short, we’ve made quite a mess. Each of these problems is worthy of its own blog post, and they will all get one in this series. For now, let’s focus on the big picture. It is clear that our meteoric development and the corresponding exponential increase in resource consumption is totally unsustainable. The damage this is doing to our environment and ecosystems is severe and, in some cases, irreversible. This is the essence of the environmental crisis.
Something must change. Whilst this post may seem pessimistic, there is still time to make the necessary changes and alter humanities’ course and avoid leaving ourselves and future generations in dire straits. Nature has an amazing capacity to recover if it is allowed to do so, and human ingenuity seemingly knows no bounds. The frustrating thing is workable technological solutions to many of our current environmental problems already exist, from renewable energy to sustainable building materials and ecologically friendly industrial practices. Recycling technology is constantly improving, and we are developing new methods for remediating polluted land and preventing further contamination. Even carbon net neutrality is a very real possibility in the next few decades if we commit to it. However, there is a simple reason why all this hasn’t already happened. Implementing these solutions means huge infrastructural changes; these are, of course, extremely costly. It will require an enormous financial investment and big sacrifices within our current way of life, but sadly it isn’t optional. The issue which must therefore be confronted is: where will this money come from?
Financial commitments to tackling climate change are being made by both public and private entities, but it is not enough. The UN’s international panel on climate change has stated that we need to be investing $2.4 trillion every year until 2035 in the energy sector alone in order to prevent an increase of 1.5 ℃ from pre-industrial levels, the goal set out in the 2015 Paris climate accord. That’s around 2.5% of the global economy. The UN estimated that total spending on mitigating climate change was just $681 billion in 2016, less than 30% of the energy sector bill. Humanity needs to cough up big time. This money needs to come from somewhere, and with the economies of developed nations not looking too great right now, the real winners of the last 50 years of industry might have to pay a bigger share of the price. Research has shown that 100 companies have accounted for 71% of global emissions since 1988, most of them in the oil business. Whilst we as the consumer ultimately drive the activities of these corporations, they are the ones making huge profits. There must be accountability for their contribution to global emissions. Policies that force companies to use more of their revenue to address their mammoth carbon footprints seem like a good place to start. Governments in many countries are gradually beginning to take more action to address climate change, habitat loss and pollution, but the progress is too slow, and many supposedly green policies are too small-scope and short-sighted to have a real impact. We need big changes in policy and in the behaviour of private companies if we’re going to beat this crisis. That is part of the reason for this blog. The power to change these things lies in part with us, the voters. Unfortunately, some people, both voters and policymakers, require more convincing that this is a priority. Hopefully, some of you will read this and rethink.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R. and Milo, R. (2018) ‘The Biomass Distribution on Earth’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25), pp. 6506 LP – 6511. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1711842115.
Begum, Tammana, ‘What is mass extinction and are we facing a sixth one?’, Natural History Museum, 2021, accessed 21 September 2021, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-is-mass-extinction-and-are-we-facing-a-sixth-one.html
Dr. Paul Griffin, ‘CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017’, The Carbon Majors Database, 2017, accessed 21 September 2021, https://b8f65cb373b1b7b15feb-c70d8ead6ced550b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf?1499691240
Dunne, Daisy and Prater, Tom, ‘Video: How Beef Farmers Can Reduce Their Carbon Footprint’, Carbon Brief, 2018, accessed 21 September 2021, https://www.carbonbrief.org/video-how-beef-farmers-can-reduce-their-carbon-footprint#:~:text=In%20total%2C%20emissions%20from%20livestock,and%20Agricultural%20Organization%20(FAO).
Hooke, Roger and Martin-Duque, Jose, ‘Land Transformation by Humans: A Review’, The Geological Society of America, 2012, accessed 21 September 2021, https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/22/12/article/i1052-5173-22-12-4.htm
Inderscience, ‘How Much Oil Have We Used?’, ScienceDaily, 2009, accessed 21 September 2021, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090507072830.htm
The Ocean CleanUp, ‘The Great Pacific Garbage Patch’, accessed 21 September 2021, https://theoceancleanup.com/great-pacific-garbage-patch/
Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, ‘Seeing the Forest and the Trees, all Three Trillion of Them: Yale-Led Study Finds there are 7 1/2 Times More Trees Than Previously Believed’, ScienceDaily, 2015, accessed 21 September 2021, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150902134941.htm
Yeo, Sophie, ‘Where climate cash is flowing and why it’s not enough’, Nature, 2019, accessed 21 September 2021, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02712-3